It Was Never Just About Driving

I used to think the point was arrival. I understand now that arrival was only the excuse.

Driving, as an activity, appears instrumental — a means of moving the body from one coordinate to another. We measure it in efficiency: fastest route, fewest stops, optimal departure time. I participated in that measurement for years without questioning the frame. The drive was the cost. The destination was the value. I accepted the arithmetic.

But there were always exceptions, even when I did not name them as such. The drives I remember are rarely the ones that got me somewhere on time. They are the ones where something happened in the interval — not an event, but a shift. A thought that finally arranged itself. A grief that found its shape. A lightness that arrived without source. The car was moving. I was moving inside it, in more than one sense. Arrival interrupted the process more often than it fulfilled it.

It was never just about driving. It was about the conditions that driving creates: enclosure without confinement, motion without exertion, solitude with a destination, which is a particular kind of permission to think. You are going somewhere, so stillness is not required. You are contained, so the world cannot make immediate demands. The highway becomes a room with a changing view and no obligation to respond to it. I have done some of my best not-driving inside cars.

What remains when the destination stops mattering is not nothing. It is the route itself — the accumulated landmarks, the muscle memory, the small rituals of departure and return. I have drives I take now where the endpoint is almost arbitrary. A convenience store. A parking lot with a view. The same rest stop I have visited a dozen times without ever feeling I was wasting time. The point is the corridor, not the door at the end of it.

People ask where I am going, and sometimes I tell the truth: nowhere, or nowhere that matters, or somewhere I have been enough times that the going is the event. They look puzzled. I understand the puzzlement. The culture does not have good language for elective motion — for choosing to be between places as a destination in itself. We have words for wanderers and commuters, but not for those of us who drive the same roads repeatedly because the repetition has become a form of thinking we cannot replicate at a desk.

I am not romanticizing highways. They are loud, polluting, occasionally dangerous, often monotonous. I am describing a personal relationship with a specific set of roads traveled at a specific frequency over a specific span of years. That relationship could not be transferred to someone else's map. It would not work in a city, or on a motorcycle, or for a person who experiences motion as anxiety rather than relief. This is mine. I offer it without recommendation.

There is a moment at the end of every drive — ignition off, keys in hand, the sudden stillness — when the interior work of the journey either consolidates or evaporates. I have learned to sit in the car for a minute before opening the door, to let the transition complete itself. That minute is not part of the driving, technically. It is part of what the driving was for.

What remains, when I try to summarize all of this, is not a lesson. I do not have one. What remains is a posture toward familiar roads — attentive, patient, willing to be changed by repetition rather than merely bored by it. The destination fades. The drive stays. I am still somewhere in the middle of that realization, which feels right. Some things should not be finished. Some roads are better driven than concluded.

Return to Journal